The Sound Lab
The Sound Lab

Follow your curiosity.

Follow a thought

What are you curious about?

Enter a word or phrase, then press Enter.

Your listening life.

Keep your place. Join the conversation.

Join the Community ↗
← The Daily

The Daily / No. 63 / Opinion

Upgrade fever, and the six-month test

New gear always sounds better on the first night, so I judge an upgrade by how it sounds once it has become just my system.

KDAbout 1 min read
A thermometer resting on top of a sealed equipment box in a dark hallway, a warm glow from a listening room spilling through the door.

Before I moved from my integrated to separates, I did not trust my own ears. The Wilsons were pushing my MA9500 harder than anything before them, and I asked myself the question I would ask any friend: is this real, or is this another upgrade fever?

There is a name for half of what I was afraid of: recency bias, one of the stops in the bias tunnel every audiophile has to pass through. The equipment you just acquired always sounds better than what you had. It is new, it is exciting, and your attention is heightened.

The cure is boring. Give it six months and suddenly it's just your system. Whatever still stands out after that, when the excitement has gone and your attention has gone back to the music, is the part that was real.

That is the test I trust more than any first night. The separates passed it, and after months with them I still hear what I heard in the first week. But I only believe that because I made myself wait, and because I admitted the fever before I admitted the improvement.

The first night tells you what you wanted. Month six tells you what you bought.

More from the Daily

Keep a thought going.

The Daily archive ↗

Loading notes…