The Sound Lab
The Sound Lab

Follow your curiosity.

Follow a thought

What are you curious about?

Enter a word or phrase, then press Enter.

Your listening life.

Keep your place. Join the conversation.

Join the Community ↗
← The Daily

The Daily / No. 95 / Opinion

A $1,070 gap that sounds smaller

I lived with a $329 streamer and a $1,400 one side by side for three months, and what I heard was far smaller than the price gap.

KDAbout 2 min read
a tiny plain streamer and a larger one with a dark glass screen sitting side by side on a rack shelf, both lit evenly by the same warm light.

One streamer cost me $329. The other cost almost $1,400. After more than three months side by side, both bought with my own money, the gap I heard was nothing like the $1,070 gap I paid.

I played them on my reference system and on a lesser one, switching between identical tracks: Six Blade Knife from Dire Straits, Patricia Barber's This Town, Take Five. My first impression has not moved since. They sound uncomfortably close for anyone who paid four times more.

On paper it should not be close at all. The Eversolo is objectively superior, with better measurements, better build, better components and more features. On my system, with a treated room, Wilsons and McIntosh separates, I can tell them apart 10 out of 10 times, because I know what to listen for. The difference is real, and it is the last 3 to 5% of performance.

Now take away the visual cues, pause for a while, and move to a system where most components sit in the $5,000 to $10,000 range. I am not convinced anyone tells them apart there. We do not listen to specifications. We listen to music, and the music here is closer than the invoice.

Is it four times better? On my reference system it is a few percent better, and a few percent is not four times.

More from the Daily

Keep a thought going.

The Daily archive ↗

Loading notes…